A new meta-analysis from the University of Washington is Processed food It’s safe to consume.
Researchers analyzed 77 different studies to assess the link between fixed amounts of these foods and common chronic diseases.
“Human consumption of small amounts of processed meat, sweet drinks and trans fatty acids is associated with an increased risk of development. Type 2 diabetesischemic heart disease and colorectal cancer,” Prime Minister Demewoz Haile, a research scientist at the University of Washington’s Institute of Health Indicators and Evaluation, told Fox News Digital.
Homemade Vs. Processed Foods: Research challenges what we think is healthier
“There is no safe level of these habitual consumption Food GroupSo they shouldn’t be included in our daily diet,” he said.
Especially for processed meat, the researchers concluded that 0.6-57 grams of diet per day is linked to an 11% higher chance of developing type 2 diabetes.
Consumption of 0.78-55 grams per day was associated with an increase of 7% Colorectal cancer Risks, research has discovered.
(A hot dog made up of almost completely processed meat costs around 50 grams.)
Researchers also analyzed the effects of sugary drinks and found that drinking 1.5-390 grams per day could increase the risk of type 2 diabetes by 8%.
The risk of diabetes is associated with a combination of these ultra-positive foods
Consuming 0-365 grams of beverage, Ischemic heart disease – The most common type of heart disease and the main cause of death – in around 2%, studies have been found.
Trans fatty acids were also analyzed in the study. Unsaturated fats account for 0.25% to 2.56% of daily energy intake, which was associated with a 3% higher risk of ischemic heart disease.
(Examples of trans fats include crackers, cookies, baked goods, frozen pizza, coffee creamers, refrigerated dough products, vegetable shortening, and some stick margarine. Fast food That’s included too. )
The findings were published in Nature Medicine on June 30th.
Previous studies have established a link between processed foods and chronic disease, Hale acknowledged.
“However, our study used more advanced analytical methods to assess the shape of the relationship with modern research and objectively assess the strength of the evidence,” he noted.
What your blood is quietly revealing about your dietary habits
“Our analysis showed that the strongest associations were observed at low levels of exposure, corresponding to subserving.
Researchers recognized that diet is a “personal choice” and could limit some food choices, but they recommend limiting or eliminating the consumption of processed foods.
“Our findings support what is widely recommended by the WHO and CDC. Sweet drinks Haile told Fox News Digital.
“Individuals who regularly consume small amounts of these foods should recognize an increased risk of chronic disease.”
Hale acknowledged that the main limitation of this study was related to the assessment of dietary intake.
“Almost all of the studies included used food frequency surveys to assess intake, which can introduce measurement errors, primarily because respondents find it difficult to remember long-term intake,” he told Fox News Digital.
Some studies Hale noted that the analysis only considered consumption at the start of the study. “This may not accurately reflect the future eating habits of study participants,” he said.
In addition, this study examined only a limited set of each health outcome. Dietary risk factors.
“As a result, our research could underestimate the total health loss associated with these foods,” Hale said.
“We also observed substantial variations among existing literature, meaning that high-quality research is still needed to strengthen the evidence and reduce uncertainty.”
Nick Norwitz, MD, a Harvard-educated clinical researcher and metabolic health educator, admitted that the study showed a “relatively consistent association” between higher processed meat intake and worse health outcomes, but pointed out several warnings.
“These are associations – not necessarily causal,” Norwitz, who was not involved in the study, told Fox News Digital.
Furthermore, Norwitz noted that the quality of the evidence was rated as “weak,” as the researchers themselves acknowledged.
“While these large-scale studies have certain strengths, one of the key weaknesses is the collection of many different foods within a single category,” the researchers continued. “There are different ways to treat meat, but not all have the same biological consequences.”
Click here to sign up for our health newsletter
It is “certainly feasible” that processed meat can contribute to poorness. Health outcomesNorwitz said more research is needed to confirm the claims of the meta-analysis.
“At the end of the day, I almost certainly do more office donuts or soda bottles. Metabolic Injury More than a slice of Deli Turkish,” he added.
A spokesman for the American Association of Meat Processors (AAMP) sent the following statement to Fox News Digital regarding the study:
“We haven’t read [full] I report, but the summary of the paper itself reflects “weak relationships or inconsistent input evidence” and argues that more research is needed. I would like to know how the paper defined “processed meat” or if researchers weighed the potential risks against proven benefits. Nutrients and proteins It’s in the meat. ”
Visit us for more health articles www.foxnews.com/health
In this study, the researchers defined processed meat as “meat preserved by smoking, hardening, salting, or adding chemical preservatives.”
Fox News Digital also contacted the Academy of Nutrition and Nutrition and the US Department of Agriculture (USDA).
