“My dog detected my cancer before the doctor did it.”
Breanna Bortner’s dog, Mochi, began to cling to her breasts before she was diagnosed with stage 2B triple-negative breast cancer, showing abnormal and intuitive behavior throughout her journey.
Those who pay more taxes may be less likely to die from cancer.
The link was revealed in a new study published on Jama Network Open, which aims to explore the impact of state-level tax revenues. Cancer screening Mortality rate in the US
Researchers from Ohio State University, Emory University, Georgia, and the University of Verona in Italy analyzed 1,150 state-year tax data over 23 years between 1997 and 2019.
New prostate cancer tests identify diseases better than PSA options, researchers say
We also reviewed population levels Cancer screening rate Cancer-related deaths from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) database.
According to a new study published in JAMA Network Open, those who pay more taxes with taxes may be less likely to die from cancer. (istock)
The state of Higher tax revenue The researchers found that cancer screening rates have increased and cancer mortality rates have decreased.
For every $1,000 increase in tax revenue per capita, the population increased by 1.61% in colorectal cancer screening, 2.17% in breast cancer screening, and cervical cancer screening rates increased by 0.72%.
Alternative cancer treatments could replace chemotherapy and surgery, studies suggest
Among those with cancerous tumors, every $1,000 increase in tax revenue per person per person reduced the death rate for up to 4% of white patients. Research found no similar reductions in risk were found in racial and ethnic minority groups.
“State-level tax policy is underestimated Social determinants of health It could improve cancer screening and mortality,” the researchers wrote.
The researchers reviewed population-level cancer screening rates and cancer-related deaths by the CDC database. (istock)
“These findings suggest that state-level tax revenues could serve as one aspect of a multifaceted approach that can help improve cancer-related outcomes in the United States and bridge the gaps in cancer care, particularly in setting more progressive tax policies.”
Click here to get the Fox News app
Previous studies have identified tax policies as predictors of public health, particularly in infant death risk and overall Healthcare results.
“One possible connection is that higher taxes mean that healthier foods must be purchased and more luxuries must be purchased for relaxation and exercise.”
“Tax revenues can serve as funds to promote a common interest by ensuring access to safety. A healthy environment Also, quality health care can result in progress taxes that significantly increase disposable income for working-class households, thus increasing standard of living and improving health and cancer outcomes,” the study states.
Click here to sign up for our health newsletter
Dr. Marc Siegel, Senior Medical Analyst and Professor of Clinical Medicine at NYU Langone Health and Fox News; He shared his external reaction to the study.
“One possible connection is that the higher the tax, the more money you have to buy healthier foods, and the more money you have to buy. Relaxation and exercise“He told Fox News Digital.
“Fastest diagnosis, better care, having more money to pay for extra treatments can also help prevent cancer deaths.” (istock)
“Fastest diagnosis, better care, having more money to pay for extra treatments can also help prevent cancer deaths.”
The study had several limitations, the researchers acknowledged – primarily the results show a connection, but have not proven that high tax rates caused a decline in mortality.
For health articles, please visit www.foxnews.com/health
Cancer screening rates were also based on surveys of patients who could have some degree of bias.
The data could also be a measurement error, the researchers warned.
